Michael Ash/Food for the Brain seminar on ‘The Gut Brain link in Autism, Depression and Mental Health’ (part 1)

In the past two days, I’ve had two e-mails from the Food for the Brain (FFTB) e-mail list, advertising a seminar by Michael Ash on ‘The Gut Brain link in Autism, Depression and Mental Health’. They certainly seem keen to encourage attendance, and at £49 for the seminar, I can understand why bookings might be a little sparse. Naturally, as FFTB are so keen to promote Ash’s speech, I thought I’d look at some of his previous work on these subjects. What seemed especially notable was Ash’s role in Nutri Link: a “Practitioner Group” which offers information on a dizzying range of interventions for children on the autistic spectrum.

A first thing to note about Nutri Link’s ‘Information for Parents’ document [PDF link] on treatments for Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) is that it is explicitly aimed at parents and carers. One wonders why – is the Nutri Link treatment meant to ‘cure’ those with ASDs before they reach adulthood? Or would adults on the autistic spectrum be unlikely to appreciate the type of interventions suggested?

A second thing to note is how many interventions are suggested. There are seven pages of relatively dense text, suggesting a dizzying range of things to do to children with ASDs. As the author(s) of the document are clearly aware, they suggest that children with ASDs take so many supplements that it will be hard to get all these pills and powders down their throats. To deal with this, they suggest (p.6) that carers

o Blend drinks
o Divide doses during day
o Small capsules can be swallowed from age 5.
o Tip the child’s head face down and the capsules
will float to the back of the throat to swallow.

I find this slightly disturbing in itself. If these were evidence-based interventions, this might be worth a try. However, I have looked for evidence that taking all these pills is useful: for most of the supplements recommended, I could not find good evidence of efficacy (or find anywhere where Ash provides references).

I won’t be able to address all my concerns about this document here: that would take far too long. However, I should also note that one can see what Holford (who is introducing Ash at the aforementioned seminar) approves of his work. Holford and Nutri Link hold a number of shared beliefs (many of which have already been critiqued on Holford Watch and elsewhere). For example, both believe – contrary to the evidence – that secretin is an autism treatment worth considering (p. 5), that hair mineral analysis is worthwhile (p. 2), and that IgG blood tests are valuable (p. 4). Nutri Link, of course, adds many problematic treatment suggestions of their own; I might come back to look at these another day.

Given the number of – in some cases pretty radical – interventions proposed, I find it especially worrying that Ash states that “[i]n many cases it is not necessary for you to actually attend a practice as a treatment plan can be undertaken through e mail and telephone consultations.” I feel that some of these treatments – for example, the gluten free casein free diet that Nutri Link recommends, or the dairy-free diet that is recommended for all children with ASDs (p. 2-3) – should be carried out under competant medical supervision (in order to avoid, for example, the failure to thrive that such diets can cause if badly implemented). When vulnerable children are involved, I just don’t think that e-mail or telephone consultations (often with ‘healthcare practitioners such as nutritionists, who may be operating without adequate qualifications or regulation) is good enough.

While I haven’t yet had time to look at much of Ash’s work – more posts on this will follow – I would argue that his role with Nutri Link raises a number of troubling questions. It would be tempting to raise some of these questions at Ash’s September seminar, but I don’t want to spring for the £49 fee.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under autism, Food for the brain, Michael Ash, patrick holford

4 responses to “Michael Ash/Food for the Brain seminar on ‘The Gut Brain link in Autism, Depression and Mental Health’ (part 1)

  1. Catherine Collins RD

    Well done on the issues raised. The parents of children with autism/ autistic spectrum disorders have a potentially stressful life coping with a child with such a condition without adopting unproven, unregulated and nutritionally inadequate diets to bolster the hypothetical musings of ‘autism guru’s’.

    As a Registered Dietitian I have had direct experience of the restricted and nutritionally inferior diets adopted by clients on the basis of ‘allergy’ tests such as AK, IgG, and Vega therapy, or adopting the musings of self-styled therapists.
    It then becomes part of the RDs role to deconstruct the mythical musings and restore the diet appropriate to the condition.

    Complete lack of regulation of such practices and therapists allows exploitation of the public keen to adopt a pro-active approach to health maintenance and disease prevention or management.

    The law does not take a benign approach to an individual without medical qualifications claiming to ‘do’ neurosurgery. We shouldn’t confer a benign opinion on those enthusiastic amateurs who think they can ‘do’ nutrition, either .

  2. Thanks Catherine. We should really be careful not to undersell Ash’s achievements, though.

    It is hard to tell exactly what he does (his writing style is somewhat unclear). However, Ash writes [PDF link] about areas including GI, neurological, immunological and liver problems, genetics, heavy metal toxicity/poisoning and mental health.

    That’s an impressive range of research and practice. Oddly, though, I’ve been struggling to find publications by Ash in reputable peer-reviewed journals, and the only qualifications he lists are “BSc (Hons) DO ND Dip ION”.

    So, Ash hasn’t taken up neurosurgery, but I’d share Catherine’s worries about whether he’s qualified to work across the diverse range of areas that he does write about.

  3. Sandra

    Your rant sounds like an elevator conversation between two members of a protected guild, who dispense with all civility to unleash their vitriol, confident in their colleagues’ shared bias. As I notice a side bar of other attacks unleashed on your site, the word “Spleen” catches my eye, which makes sense in your case.

    Running with the pack is no guarantee of understanding, nor is it always a guarantee of safety. In the case of mainstream medicine enormous damage is wracked under the protection of such herd behavior (an estimated 100,000 heart attacks from Viox comes to mind as one example). And in your case, such an admission of ignorance of your target’s work along with such aggression and superficial criticism (a GBP49 fee scarcely gets you into a health seminar in this country and sounds like near pro bono work) is extraordinary. I can only surmise that someone in this vast field hurt you once, and you have contrived to cure the trauma with this on-going blunt force smear crusade.

    Disclosures: No connections of any sort with the author you target, you, nor any professional connections with any medical field.

    • I think that, when treating vulnerable children, using treatments without good evidence of safety or efficacy (or where there is evidence that the treatments don’t work) is a bad thing. Not sure what this has to do with Viox.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s