BBC “never intended to give Quinnell a platform in any way to promote Dore”

We have previously blogged about how BBC1 gave Scott Quinnell a golden opportunity to plug Dore (a non-evidence based treatment for dyslexia and various learning difficulties) uncritically. We complained to the BBC about this, and have just had a response: it was very disappointing.

The BBC simply replied that

it was never intended to give Quinnell a platform in any way to promote Dore. It was more of an attempt at reflecting a human interest story whereby an international sportsman has had to cope with this disadvantage.

If this interview was not intended to give Quinnell an opportunity to plug Dore, then it was seriously mishandled (watch this YouTube clip to see what I mean). However, the BBC do not seem to acknowledge the extent of their failure, and there is no mention of what (if any) action they will take to prevent similar failures in future, and no apology for the poor standard of the interview with Quinnell.

Science coverage in the media is sometimes criticised for offering ‘balanced’ discussion that attributes equal value to both evidence-based position and non-evidence-based arguments. In this case, though, the BBC gave all the air time to the unchallenged advocacy of a time-consuming, expensive treatment that lacks a good evidence base.

This standard of broadcasting would not be seen as acceptable in – for example – BBC politics coverage. So why should it be tolerated with science coverage?

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Dore, dyslexia, dyspraxia

2 responses to “BBC “never intended to give Quinnell a platform in any way to promote Dore”

  1. I don’t know to what level you have escalated this; but the BBC’s response is typical of the kind of replies that I have had on other occaisions. The ECU have been pretty good. Generally, the biggest problem is getting anything actually done.

    Still, the BBC is nowhere near as bad, in my experience, as C4.

    • Thanks. I haven’t escalated beyond this first ‘proper’ response (although I did challenge a decision to not respond to my complaint as the BBC claimed it was received too late – it wasn’t). Oddly, there’s no ‘if you want to appeal’ option in the response I got.

      Oh yes, Channel 4

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s